FEMINIST DISCUSSIONS II

4 May

Sex Workers

Millions of women like Ms. Oxana Rantseva emigrate to other countries on an “artiste visa” in search for a better life. Instead, they find themselves sucked into a dark world, stripped of choice and agency. However, many women, such as those in the infamous “Red Light District,” choose to pose behind glass windows, and in fact, empower themselves outside the boundaries of social mores.

On Saturday, May 5th, Amargi will  hold a discussion questioning the assumptions surrounding women and transgenders who participate in sex services. In today’s feminist movement, how should we view their bodies–as objects or subjects? Do people who choose this path enjoy the same rights and freedoms as other citizens? And does the state sufficiently protect the rights of those who do not choose this path but find themselves trapped? We will discuss these and other issues with our guest, Şevval Kılıҫ.

As recommended preparation, we suggest that you read the following Text.

LOOKING AT TURKEY’S POLICY THROUGH PINAR SELEK’S CASE

26 Apr

        

A PANEL AT STRASBOURG

Turkey in the Mirror of Selek Case

Atalay, Alp Selek, Çalışlar, Karakaşlı, Direk, Pradel, Lauchbihler and Flautre discussed the judiciary problems in Turkey using Pınar Selek case as example.

  

The symbolic role of the case of Pınar Selek from the point of democracy in Turkey was stressed during the international gathering in Strasbourg.

 The participants of the meeting were Pınar Selek case lawyer Akın Atalay, Pınar Selek’s father and lawyer Alp Selek, journalist and author Oral Calislar, journalist and author Karin Karakaşlı, philosophy professor and author Zeynep Direk, lawyer Martin Pradel from FIDH, Chairman of the EP Human Rights Subcommittee Barbara Lauchbihler and the President of the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Commission Hélène Flautre.

 

“Justice for Pınar Selek is a requirement of democracy”

 

The city of Strasbourg hosted an important international meeting. The meeting with the title, “The case of  Pınar Selek and the problems of jurisdiction” was held on the 18th of April with the initiatives of Union of Citizens with origins from Turkey Associations (RACORT) and its member associations (The Citizens’ Movement among Cultures in Strasbourg (ASTU), The Citiziens’ Assembly in Paris (L’ACORT) and Workers’ Assocation in Etz in Moselle) in the Unions House. The meeting was moderated by the historician and political scientist, Samim Akgönül, from Strasbourg University and it started with the message of solidarity of Helene Flautre, the Chair of the Delegation to EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee.

 

The importance of Selek Case’s symbolic meaning

Pınar Selek case has been on the agenda for 14 years. The symbolic meaning of this case in terms of Turkey’s democracy was discussed in the meeting and the participants called for support.

Chairman of the EP Human Rights Subcommittee Barbara Lauchbihler made the opening speech and mentioned that they were following the judiciary process of Pınar Selek case closely and they would continue to contribute to freedom of expression process in Turkey by the Progress Reports they issue.

Alp Selek and lawyer Akın Atalay examined the unlawful details of the ongoing case for fourteen years.

In the darkness of February 28

Alp Selek stated that even though it was clear that the explosion was because of the gas leak and Pınar Selek’s statements were taken under torture, they insistently try to convict her. They seized her scientific study about Kurdish movement and they convicted her by Egyptian Bazaar conspiracy.

He underlined the interventions of police headquarters, Foreign Ministry, Interior Ministry and Ministry of Justice to this case at the darkest period of Feb.28 and added that although Pınar Selek has been acquitted 3 times, there’s an inexplicably insistent attempt for the case to persist.

Lawyer Pradel from FIDH expressed that their organization is following this case closely; philosophy professor and author Zeynep Direk pointed out the extraordinary perspective of Pınar Selek as the sociologist.

While describing Selek’s studies, Direk said that Selek adopted the “asking independent questions towards groups of people who are exposed to violence due to their ethnic and sexual identities” method.

“The attitude of the media has changed”

Journalist and author Oral Çalışlar has been following the case closely for 14 years. He stated that media process began with targeting headlines and police cooperation but in time it evolved to a point of solidarity and the media began to give place to the facts. Oral Çalışlar indicated that primarily the press contacts of Alp Selek and the solidarity of all groups who want justice for Pınar Selek were effective on this. Oral Çalışlar also asked for support from abroad.

Finally journalist and author Karin Karakaşlı began to her speech by talking about Hrant Dink who introduced Pınar Selek to her.  She mentioned the process of targeting people who struggle for peace and she talked about the necessity to look for justice at the sense of community, as it cannot appear at Turkish courts. She underlined that the solidarity for Pınar Selek brought together many different groups in accordance with Selek’s philosophy of life and politics.  She finally expressed that when Pınar Selek is released, live happily and work productively in Turkey that will be the sign of democracy for Turkey.

 

The meeting ended after the questions of the audience which showed a big interest in the event and the common decision and will about the continuation of similar meetings of solidarity were expressed.

 

FEMINIST DISCUSSIONS II

26 Apr

Ecology and Feminism

This week we will talk about the ecology movement and the feminist movement. Is it possible to combine those two movements? We will discuss what we understand under ecofeminism. Even if there are some feminists, who are related to ecofeminism, how is it possible that ecofeminism isn’t so strong? On Saturday, 28th of April, we will discuss about these issues. The discussion will be held in turkish.

FEMINIST DISCUSSIONS II

19 Apr

Feminism and Anti-Militarism

What is the relationshıp between feminism and anti-militarism? Should feminism always be anti-militarist? What are the precise objections of the conscientious objectors? On Saturday, April 21st, at 1:00pm, we will dıscuss these issues in depth. The discussion will be held in Turkish.

 

Report: Feminists Visit Uludere After the Massacre

19 Apr

In February of 2012, members of Amargi and other feminist organizations visited Uludere, a district in southeastern Turkey. They spoke to the family members of the victims that were killed on December 29th, 2011 by Turkish military forces. All of the victims were civilians, 19 of whom were children, and they were allegedly mistaken to be terrorists. The members of Amargi wrote a report documentıng their experiences, in which the family members clearly articulated what they wanted from the state: “They demand an official apology (which has still not been offered to them), they demand peace not revenge, they demand a fair investigation and trial process (which has not really started yet), they demand that people and authorities responsible for this massacre should be judged fairly and punished. They strongly object to take the compensation offered to them by the state for the ‘loss’ of the families.”

Full report:

21 women from different cities went to Roboski, a village of Uludere district in one of the southern cities of Turkey, Şırnak where 34 civilians (19 were children) were killed on December 29th, 2011 by the military forces of the state. After the incident, public authorities told that villagers who were doing border trade were thought to be ‘terrorists’ and were shot ‘accidentally’. The investigation still continues due to the presence of evidence (including the images recorded at the time of the incident) showing that it was not a mere ‘operational mistake’.

Members of Istanbul Feminist Collective, (İFK, İstanbul Feminist Kolektif) gathered at the airport on February 11th, 2012, very early in the morning and flied to Diyarbakır. Meeting with women from Diyarbakır and Van (cities in the east and south east), they got on a bus and started a nearly 8 hours of journey to the village. In Şırnak, they met with another woman from a local women’s organization (Zilan Women’s Association, Zilan Kadın Derneği) who had formerly called women from all over the country to come to Roboski through a feminist news program on TV (Purple News/ IMC TV, Mor Bülten/IMC TV), 10 days after the incident.  After this last stop in Şırnak, women headed to Uludere. Three activists from Amargi took place in this journey, as well.

When we arrived at Roboski, we were welcomed by a commitee in front of the mosque of the village. Both women and men greeted us in front of the door. Then, we went in to see all the acquintances of 34 villagers, holding their beloved one’s photos within frames. They were mostly mothers who carried the frames. Besides, there were sisters, wives, daughters, female cousins. They all stood side by side to welcome us. Thus, we offered our condolence to all of them one by one, each of us kissing, holding, and trying to have/ share a few words with all of the women standing there. Men sat on the other side of the mosque, greeting us as well. Then, we all sat and prayed for the ones who were killed. One of the feminists among us made a short speech stating the reason why we were there and offered our condolence again. While sitting together with women there, we talked and cried. Those who spoke Turkish among women from Roboski translated the sentences of Kurdish speaking villagers to us. Unfortunately, none of us spoke Kurdish. They told us whom they lost and the story of that very day briefly.

Villagers suggested that it was late to go and visit the graves as we formerly planned. Thus, it was decided that all of us would go to houses to spend the night. Forming nearly 6 groups, we all went to different houses, each group including 3 or 4 women.  During our stay at the houses, we had chance to talk more and try at least to share the sorrow. We had chance to talk to women more, as well. All the stories that women told us naturally started with the massacre but we also shared some stories about being a woman in Uludere. As feminists, we could realize that women from Roboski were not only ‘mourning mothers’ who lost their children contrary to how they are represented in the main-stream media or in most of the articles written about the massacre. They had an anger which motivated them to utter their political demands clearly from the state and from all people living in this land who keep being silent about the massacre and the investigation process which is going nowhere.

They demand an official apology (which has still not been offered to them), they demand peace not revenge, they demand a fair investigation and trial process (which has not really started yet), they demand that people and authorities responsible for this massacre should be judged fairly and punished. They strongly object to take the compensation offered to them by the state for the ‘loss’ of the families. Moreover, villagers in most of the houses told us that they will leave the country unless anything convincing is done for a fair trial before spring comes.

Everybody, especially children and women wanted us to stay more. However, we had to gather very early the next morning in the mosque again to set off. Most villagers told us that they were glad that we stayed overnight being guests at their houses since we had more time to talk and share. They said most of the groups visiting the village came and stayed for a few hours only and this makes it quite impossible to share the feeling and to tell what happened in details. They wanted us to tell and write about the things they told us. They are aware of the fact that the main-stream media has not told the story correctly and does not hear their voices and demands. They wanted us to make their demands visible and to tell them in a true way to those who are not aware of what did really happen at Roboski.

It was a very hard journey for all of us. However, visiting the village meant more than just being in solidarity with people of Uludere. It was a political necessity for feminists to go there and state their objection against the politics of war. After coming back, we organized a meeting in Istanbul with women and told them our impressions and experiences. We screened the intervies we recorded there with the villagers. Women among us also wrote some articles about the visit. One of them was written by an Amargi member.

   

 

 

 

 

SEXUALITY WORKSHOP: PINA (MOVIE)

19 Apr

Today, on April 19th at 7:15 pm, we will hold a sexuality workshop and watch a movie about the choreographer Pina Bausch. After the movie, we will discuss how she employs her body through dance from a feminist perspective.

FEMINIST DISCUSSIONS II

12 Apr

This Saturday, the 14th of april at 13:00, we will discuss the topic Anarcha-feminism and its political potentials with Göksun Yazıcı.

Here are the texts that you can read and prepare for the discussion. Peggy 4. hafta & 4. hafta CiCek

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 46 other followers